Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/1852
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVan Wyk, Byron Jay-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T12:27:49Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-26T06:13:42Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-27T12:27:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-26T06:13:42Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/1852-
dc.descriptionThesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Technology Design in the Faculty of Informatics and Design at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology Supervisor: Prof J Messeter Cape Town, 2013en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this research project was to provide an answer to the question: “How can an understanding of online trust be used to build valuable online applications in Higher Education?” In order to present an answer to this question, a literature survey was conducted to establish: • An understanding of the phenomenon of online trust • What the factors are that influence a loss of trust in the online environment The literature survey highlighted several factors that influence a loss of trust in the online environment, called trust cues. These factors, however, were often tested within the E-commerce environment, and not in organization-specific contexts, such as online platforms in use in Higher Education. In order to determine whether or not these factors would influence the development of trust in context-specific environments, the author of this research grouped the indentified trust factors into three focus areas, i.e. content, ease of use, and navigation. These factors were then incorporated into a series of nine different prototypes. These prototypes were different versions of a particular online platform currently in use at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT). The prototypes were tested over a three week period, with certain staff members at the institution in question recruited as test participants. During each week of user observations, a different focus area was targeted, in order to establish the impact that it would have on the perceived trustworthiness of the platform in question. User observations were conducted while test participants completed a standard process using the various prototypes. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted while participants completed the specific process. Participants were asked to evaluate each screen in the process according to its perceived trust worthiness, by assigning a trust level score. At the completion of the three rounds of user observations, in-depth interviews were conducted with test participants. The participants’ trust level scores for each prototype were captured and graphed. A detailed description for the score given for a particular screen was presented on each graph. These scores were combined to provide an analysis of the focus area tested during the specific round. After the three rounds of user observations were completed, an analysis of all the trust factors tested were done. Data captured during interviews were transcribed, combined with feedback received from questionnaires, and analysed. An interpretation of the results showed that not all trust factors had a similar influence in the development of trust in the online platform under investigation. Trust cues such as content organization, clear instructions and useful content were by far the most significant trust factors, while others such as good visual design elements, professional images of products, and freedom from grammatical and typographical errors had little or no impact in the overall trustworthiness of the platform under investigation. From the analysis done it was clear that the development of trust in organization-specific contexts is significantly different than developing trust in an E-commerce environment and that factors that influence the development of trust in one context might not always be significant in another. In conclusion, it is recommended that when software applications are developed in organization-specific contexts, such as Higher Education, that trust factors such as good content organization, clear instructions and useful content be considered as the most salient. Organization-specific contexts differ quite significantly in that the users of these systems often convey a certain degree of trust toward the online platforms that they work with on a daily basis. Trust factors that are geared toward developing an initial or basic trust in a particular platform, which is often the case with first time users engaging in an E-commerce platform, would therefore not be as significant in the development of a more developed level of trust, which is what is needed within the development of organization-specific online platforms.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectCape Peninisula University of Technology. Computer and Telecommunication Services.en_US
dc.subjectInformation technology -- Management -- South Africa.en_US
dc.subjectComputer networks -- Management -- South Africa.en_US
dc.subjectCustomer services -- Management -- South Africa.en_US
dc.subjectSupport services (Management) -- South Africa.en_US
dc.subjectTelecommunication systems -- South Africa.en_US
dc.subjectInformation technology -- Moral and ethical aspects.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Higher -- Effect of technological innovations on.en_US
dc.subjectInternet in education.en_US
dc.subjectUniversities and colleges -- Administration.en_US
dc.subjectUniversities and colleges -- Data processing.en_US
dc.subjectOnline trusten_US
dc.subjectDissertations, Academic.en_US
dc.subjectMTechen_US
dc.subjectTheses, dissertations, etc.en_US
dc.titleE-trust: a building block for developing valuable online platforms in Higher Educationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Education - Masters Degrees
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
VanWyk_B_M-Tech_Thesis_FINAL.pdfThesis1.08 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

163
checked on Jan 17, 2021

Download(s)

18
checked on Jan 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons