Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2003
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMundembe, Richard., Dren_US
dc.contributor.advisorLewu, Francis., Profen_US
dc.contributor.authorAyeleso, Taiwo Bettyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-13T06:14:46Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-06T10:33:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-13T06:14:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-06T10:33:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2003-
dc.descriptionThesis (MTech (Agriculture))--Cape Peninsula University Of Technology, 2016.en_US
dc.description.abstractBambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea), a dicotyledonous plant is a legume which has a potential to contribute to food security and nutrition. Protoplasts are naked plant cells lacking cell walls. Viable protoplasts are potentially totipotent. Therefore, when given the correct stimuli, each protoplast is capable, theoretically, of regenerating a new wall and undergoing repeated mitotic division to produce daughter cells from which fertile plants may be regenerated through the tissue culture process. Protoplast systems are valuable and versatile cell based systems that are useful in observing cellular processes and activities. In this study, the isolation of protoplast from the leaves of Bambara groundnut plant was extensively optimised. The factors affecting protoplast isolation considered in this study were ages of plant material, mannitol concentration, combinations and concentrations of enzymes and duration of incubation. Effects of ages of Bambara groundnut plant (4, 6, 8, 10 weeks), molarities of mannitol (0.4 M, 0.5 M. 0.6 M and 0.7 M), concentration and combination of enzymes (1%, 2% and 4% cellulase, 0.5% and 1% macerozyme and, 0.5% and 1% pectinase) at different incubation duration (4, 18, 24, 42 hours) were investigated. Overall, it can be deduced from this study that the optimal protoplast yield (4.6 ± 0.14×105ml-1/gFW) and viability (86.5 ± 2.12%) were achieved by digesting the leaves of four week old Bambara groundnut plant with 2% cellulase and 0.5 % macerozyme with 0.5M mannitol for 18 hours. Freshly isolated protoplasts were then cultured at different densities of 1 × 104 - 2 ×106 protoplasts/ml using MS in three different culture (Liquid, agar and agarose bead) methods. First cell division was observed only in liquid medium. With several attempts, no division was achieved in the agar and agarose bead methods, division also did not progress in the liquid medium and hence, plant regeneration from Bambara groundnut protoplasts could not be achieved in this study. Consequently, a further study is underway to compare the proteomic profiles of freshly isolated protoplasts and cultured protoplasts in order to gain insights into the expression of proteins that could perhaps be contributing to the difficulty in regenerating Bambara groundnut plant through protoplast technology. The present study is novel because it is the first study to optimise the various factors that could affect protoplast isolation from the leaves of Bambara groundnut and thus developed an efficient protocol for protoplasts isolation from leaves of Bambara groundnut for cell manipulation studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninisula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/en
dc.subjectBambara groundnuten_US
dc.subjectDicotyledonous planten_US
dc.subjectPlant protoplastsen_US
dc.subjectCell cultureen_US
dc.subjectPlant genetic transformationen_US
dc.subjectPlant enzymesen_US
dc.subjectPlant biotechnologyen_US
dc.titleProtoplast isolation and plant regeneration in Bambara groundnut : a platform for transient gene expressionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Agriculture - Masters Degrees
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
213107996_Ayeleso_TB_MTech_Agri_Appsc_2016.pdfThesis2 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,390
Last Week
0
Last month
6
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Download(s)

778
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons