Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2213
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMoll, C. M., Profen_US
dc.contributor.authorSobrinho, Leonel Galvino Lucianoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-11T13:20:05Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-09T11:19:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-11T13:20:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-09T11:19:45Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2213-
dc.descriptionThesis (MTech (Quality))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2015en_US
dc.description.abstractThe global consulting industry has become a significant contributor to economies worldwide due to the growing requirement for specialised skills, but the industry encounters tense flaws and pitfalls. These pitfalls are related to the increasing amount of consulting engagements that fall short of their desired goal. The inability to fully achieve the goals agreed upon yields questions regarding the quality of service provided within the industry. It is believed that this inability to perform and to meet goals is due to gaps that occur within the consulting process. This research aims to determine whether there is a lack of quality in the full spectrum of the consulting process, which ultimately hampers the success of the consulting engagement. A non-empirical and qualitative research method was used to investigate the nature of the gaps and the main reasons for these gaps within the consulting process. A framework was developed in order to assist the researcher in understanding whether quality methods can successfully address or narrow the gaps in the consulting process that inhibit the success of consulting engagements or the ability to meet all requirements of consulting engagements. Validation was carried out through interviews with experts in the consulting industry. After a study of current literature it was clear that the fields of project management, change management and knowledge management are imperative when running a consulting engagement. Results of this study indicated that the framework is a viable quality methodology that can indeed be applied to address gaps in the consulting process. This is acquired through an interaction of fields such as systems thinking, audits, customer focus, corrective action and quality awareness. The framework was designed to add value and attempt to assure that the goals of consulting engagements can be fully achieved. Suggested further research includes the implementation of the framework in small consulting firms to investigate its practical usability and feasibility.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/en
dc.subjectConsulting contractsen_US
dc.subjectQuality assuranceen_US
dc.subjectEngineering consultantsen_US
dc.subjectEngineering consultants -- Quality controlen_US
dc.titleQuality assurance of consulting engagements in engineering industriesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Industrial and Systems Engineering - Master's Degree
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
208198741_Sobrinho_LGL_MTech_Quality_Eng_2016.pdfThesis2.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,632
Last Week
1,014
Last month
1,014
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

3,172
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons