Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2328
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVan der Walt, Tjaart Nicolaas, Profen_US
dc.contributor.advisorVan Eeden, Nestor, Dren_US
dc.contributor.authorTasana, Nomalanga Gloriaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T10:35:41Z
dc.date.available2017-04-13T10:35:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2328-
dc.descriptionThesis (MTech (Chemistry))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2016en_US
dc.description.abstractBoron concentration analysis is an important and critical analysis performed by the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory at Koeberg Nuclear Power Station (KNPS), because boron controls reactivity and the concentration determination is a Technical Specification Parameter (safety parameter). Hence accurate, precise results for boron concentration produced by laboratories and on-line analysers are important because of their operational implications associated with reactivity control and also for nuclear safety. The project focused on comparing the quality of chemical analysis results of boron produced by analysis techniques/ methods used at Koeberg Nuclear Power Station namely; Potentiometric Titration, Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (Flame) and UV-VIS Azomethine-H method. The methods were described, optimised, evaluated and compared in terms of uncertainty of measurement, accuracy, precision, analysis range, limitations, appropriateness and applicability for boron analysis in 2500 mg B/kg concentration range. For Potentiometric Titration method, the measurement uncertainty = 2500 ±16 mg B/kg, accuracy= 0.2%, precision= 0.08% the range of analysis= 5-800 mg B/kg. For Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (Flame) the measurement uncertainty= 2500 ±51 mg B/kg, accuracy= 0.12%, precision= 0.44% the range of analysis= 0 -500 mg B/kg. For UV-VIS Azomethine-H the measurement uncertainty= 2500 ±72 mg B/kg, accuracy= 0.08%, precision= 0.44% the range of analysis= 0 -10 mg B/kg. The INPOs 95% accuracy and precision criteria for boron is ± 1%. So these techniques could be used for boron analysis in PWR. Based on the evaluation and assessments mentioned above; the Potentiometric Titration was found to be the most preferred method for boron analysis for Pressurised Water Reactors followed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (Flame) that can be of good use in determining boron especially in waste samples and samples with complex matrices. The UV-VIS Azomethine-H methods can only be used when it is really necessary to determine very low levels of boron between 0- 10mg B/kg of which it was never required before. Since it is specifically the B-10 isotope that is responsible for the ability to control reactivity, the implementation of isotopic boron analysis (by Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry) at KNPS is explained and the advantage of the programme is illustrated. Although the current state of instrumental capabilities is adequate for 10B isotope determination, further work of optimising the methodology for even better results is recommended.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/
dc.subjectBoron concentrationen_US
dc.subjectAtomic absorption spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectPotentiometryen_US
dc.titleOptimisation and evaluation of boron analysis for pressurized Water reactor plantsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Chemistry - Masters Degrees
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
196094372-Tasana-NG-Mtech-Chemistry-Appsc-2016.pdfThesis4.87 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,190
Last Week
1,036
Last month
1,036
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

479
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons