Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2446
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVan Zyl, IzakEN
dc.contributor.authorDebarry, Olivia Samantha-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-26T09:53:38Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-26T09:53:38Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2446-
dc.descriptionThesis (MTech (Graphic Design))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2016.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the South African advertising industry, blame is often cast on the designer for a failed campaign. However, human interactions are multi-faceted and deserve further exploration, particularly if the designer is expected to be socially responsible. If this is the case, one has to consider society as a whole if potentially life-saving or socially transformative advertising campaigns are going to be impactful. This study focuses on a specific public awareness campaign related to HIV/Aids education, the loveLife campaign, and how its billboards were interpreted. This study employs a qualitative research design and semiotic analysis with student participants from schools in Cape Town, South Africa, to investigate how the target audience understands and interprets campaign billboards.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectBillboardsen_US
dc.subjectAdvertising, Outdooren_US
dc.subjectVisual communicationen_US
dc.subjectSemioticsen_US
dc.titleThe interpretation of visual cues on billboards in urban and periurban areas : a semiotic analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Graphic Design - Master's Degrees
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
201100916-Debarry-Olivia-Samantha-Mtech-Graphic-Design-FID-2017.pdfThesis4.41 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,424
Last Week
1,470
Last month
1,470
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

1,934
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons