Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2798
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Mlitwa, Nhlanhla | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ivala, Eunice | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mhungu, Blessed Aspinas | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-15T08:34:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-15T08:34:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2798 | - |
dc.description | Thesis (MTech (Graphic Design))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2018. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Rapid advances in information technology and the Internet continue to create higher education learning solutions for the networked-world learner. Given the potential of these resources, opportunities and initiatives must be seized to promote the enhancement of student learning in higher education. The promise of faster communication networks and changes in students’ expectations have rendered urgent the understanding of technology and online learning for use in studio-based teaching and learning spaces in the networked global village of the 21st century. Paradoxically, however, the use of e-learning solutions in design-related education remains limited. In studio-based courses such as graphic and architectural design, for example, the facilitation of learning through electronic media at South African universities ranges from the minimal to the non-existent. A hands-on approach to studio-based teaching and learning is preferred, supported by the argument that it is hard to facilitate experiential learning through semi-synchronous online tools. The danger of this unsubstantiated model of thinking is that it is likely to lead to under-usage of Learning Management System (LMS) tools by educators in studio-based teaching and learning spaces. The problem is that no research has been done on this area in South Africa that is capable of providing conclusive evidence on which corrective measures can be based. Hence, the aim of this study is to understand the reasons for the limited adoption and use of LMSs in studio-based teaching and learning in South African higher education design-related disciplines. Within the interpretive epistemological paradigm, a qualitative research approach was adopted to source and analyse interview data from design students and lecturers at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT). An Activity Theory (AT) analytical framework was employed. The findings suggest that reservations regarding the use of LMSs are more a function of prevailing perceptions than they are substantive. Unfounded negative assumptions about the functionality, relevance (usefulness), accessibility and ease of use of the systems emerged as the leading constructions of and explanations for the challenges faced. The study provides not only clarity on LMS usage patterns in studio-based educational spaces, but also useful comparative data on how an activity theory-grounded in ActAD framework can enhance the analysis of LMS activities in studio-based teaching and learning within the curricula for subjects like graphic design and architecture. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cape Peninsula University of Technology | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 | - |
dc.subject | Learning Management Systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Design -- Study and teaching (Higher) | en_US |
dc.subject | Universities and colleges -- Computer-assisted instruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Internet in higher education | en_US |
dc.subject | Educational technology | en_US |
dc.title | Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the usefulness of LMSs in studio-based teaching and learning spaces at a University of Technology | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Graphic Design - Master's Degrees |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
210226935-Mhungu-Blessed Aspinas-MTech-Graphic Design-FID-2018 (1).pdf | Thesis | 5.84 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
847
Last Week
2
2
Last month
6
6
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Download(s)
1,709
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License