Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/3184
Title: Coping and adaptation strategies for agricultural water use during drought periods in the Overberg and West Coast Districts, Western Cape, South Africa
Authors: Pili, Olwethu 
Keywords: Drought management;Crops -- Effect of drought on;Irrigation farming;Water-supply -- Management
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Abstract: Droughts and floods are becoming more frequent globally due to climate change. In South Africa, drought has been one of the most significant disasters in recent times, with regions such as the Western Cape province among the most affected. The resultant food and water shortages have necessitated the need for robust strategies to cope and adapt, especially for smallholder farmers whose livelihoods depend on water and farming. Understanding how smallholder farmers cope in the face of drought and prepare for future droughts to minimise impacts associated with drought is crucial. This study identified agricultural water use; coping and adaptation strategies that can be adopted and implemented by crop and livestock farmers in Overberg and West Coast Districts, in the Western Cape, during the recent 2015-2018 drought. The study also analysed factors that hinder smallholder farmers from adopting beneficial livelihood strategies during drought periods. Data were collected from 100 smallholder farmers from the two districts through face-to-face interview surveys and focus group discussions. Survey data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 20, while qualitative data was analysed using Atlas ti, Version 8. Twelve agricultural water coping strategies were identified. In the West Coast District (WCD), smallholder farmers (SHF) mainly coped with the drought by utilising borehole water (21%), purchasing fodder (18%), and selling livestock (21%). Strategies such as grazing management (6%), limiting production (3%), and rainwater harvesting (3%) were not commonly adopted. In the Overberg District (OD), smallholder farmers mainly coped with drought through purchasing fodder (34%); they had no option but to spend their money to maintain livestock herd. They also transported water using ‘bakkies’ (27%). Other coping strategies included borehole water (7%), grazing management (7%), selling livestock (7%), and using municipal water. Strategies such as drip irrigation (3%), no-till farming (2%), limiting production (2%), and rainwater harvesting (2%) were not commonly adopted by SHFs. About 68% and 64% of smallholder farmers in WCD and OD, respectively, had not put in place any adaptation strategies. Only 32% of SHFs in the WCD and 34% SHFs in the OD had adopted adaptation strategies. Among farmers in the WCD, adaptation strategies included storing feeds (7%), planting their fodder (5%), and installing water tanks (5%). In the OD, adaptation strategies included storing fodder (13%), storing water (5%), drilling boreholes (5%), saving money (4%), purchasing fodder (4%) and paying insurance (4%). Strategies such as conservation farming, alien plant clearance, moving livestock to secure areas, selling livestock, rainwater harvesting, and installing water tanks were not widely implemented by smallholder farmers. In the WCD, the main factor that stopped farmers (about 80%) from adopting adaptation strategies was lack of drought awareness (80%). Other factors included lack of finance (7%), drought relief (3%), lack of water (3%), with one farmer conceding that they were not well equipped to adapt to drought. Similar to the WCD, the main factor that hindered the adoption of adaption strategies in the OD was lack of drought awareness (62%). Other factors included limited farming resources (10%), short-term planning (10%), lack of finances (3%), lack of knowledge about drought impacts and adaptation strategies (3%), and limited land (3%). Farmers were not well informed about possible proactive agricultural water use strategies that could build their resilience towards drought. Farmers had limited options for agricultural water use strategies to choose from. A large number of SHFs had implemented no agricultural water use drought adaptation strategies. Even some of the adaptation strategies mentioned were not adopted. Results showed that farmers were generally not equipped for drought and there was a lack of public awareness of the actual occurrence of drought. Recommendations for future preparedness for crop farmers include mulching, drip irrigation, growing vegetables with shorter growing periods such as cabbage, planting of short-season crops such as maize, and changing planting dates. For livestock farmers, adaptation strategies can include drilling boreholes, altering livestock herds such as changing to goats that are resistant to drought. There is a clear need for proactive early warning systems to improve the drought preparedness for SHFs and to safeguard them from the ravages of drought. All key players in policy implementation in the agricultural sector need to focus on smallholder farmers to build their resilience by improving drought knowledge and enhancing coping and adaptation capacities. The support could be in the form of credit facilities, involving smallholder farmers in drought resilience activities and giving relevant information and training on different drought strategies.
Description: Thesis (Master of Environmental Health)--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2020
URI: http://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/3184
Appears in Collections:Environmental Health - Masters Degrees

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pili_Olwethu_213017679.pdf2.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

126
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

28
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.