Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/1318
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Irvine Alfred Caleb-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-17T08:01:18Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-20T05:23:52Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-17T08:01:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-20T05:23:52Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/1318-
dc.descriptionThesis (MTech (Graphic Design))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2004en_US
dc.description.abstractInkjet printers have evolved in recent years to the extent that many are capable of making prints of a quality closely approximating traditional colour photographs. These printers cost a fraction of the capital outlay needed to equip a traditional colour darkroom and have brought high quality colour printing within the reach of a broad spectrum of users. As they are capable of printing on a wide range of materials and print surfaces prints from inkjet printers are also in demand by fine artists and art collectors. Commercial printmakers, artists, photographers, and amateurs printing in their homes or offices use these printers. The convenience, ease, and quality of inkjet printing have made it a popular additional and alternative photographic printing technique. However, manufacturers seldom publish data regarding the expected life of the printer output. With traditional colour photographs end users expect some fading to take place with time and can normally have another print made from the original negative. Digital images rely on storage on compact disk or computer hard drive with potential long-term retrieval problems, and it is vital that important images be output in print form on the most stable materials. This study arose from the author’s concern about the archival qualities of photographs in general. In order to enable end users to make more informed choices about the most suitable printing medium, this study explored two aspects concerning traditional photographs and inkjet prints, namely cost and image permanence. The comparative costs were found by means of a questionnaire survey conducted among a representative sample of printmakers. The limits of image permanence were determined by subjecting sample prints to a high-intensity light source to accelerate the process of image fading over time to the point where the print becomes unacceptable. The investigation showed that inkjet prints are more expensive than traditional photographs, and that inkjet prints made with pigment inks can last twice as long as traditional photographs. Different inkjet papers were found to have no significant effect on the life of the print during the period of this test. Inkjet prints made with dyes were shown to have a short life before fading unacceptably. The study led to the recommendation that for the longest print life a print to be displayed should be printed on an inkjet paper with pigment inks.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPeninsula Technikonen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectPhotography -- Printing processes.en_US
dc.titleThe life and cost of inkjet prints compared with traditional photographic processes.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Design - Master's Degree
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
184026431_Meyer_iac_MTech_design_20041.14 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,421
Last Week
1
Last month
1,311
checked on Sep 26, 2024

Download(s)

333
checked on Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons