Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2193
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKahn, M.T.E., Profen
dc.contributor.authorEljaaidi, Abdalla Agila-
dc.contributor.otherCape Peninsula University of Technology. Faculty of Engineering. Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-15T07:33:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-09T10:01:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-15T07:33:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-09T10:01:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2193-
dc.descriptionThesis (MTech (Electrical Engineering))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2016.en_US
dc.description.abstractUltrasound is widely used in most medical clinics, especially obstetrical clinics. It is a way of imaging methods that has important diagnostic value. Although useful in many different applications, diagnostic ultrasound is especially useful in antenatal (before delivery) diagnosis. The use of two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) in obstetrics has been established. However, there are many disadvantages of 2DUS imaging. Several researchers have published information on the significance of patients being shown the ultrasound screen during examination, especially during three- and four-dimensional (3D/4D) scanning. In addition, a form of ultrasound, called keepsake or entertainment ultrasound, has boomed, particularly in the United States. However, long-term epidemiological studies have failed to show the adverse effects of ultrasound in human tissues. Until now, there is no proof that diagnostic ultrasound causes harm in a human body or the developing foetus when used correctly. While ultrasound is supposed to be absolutely safe, it is a form of energy and, as such, has effects on tissues it traverses (bio-effects). The two most important mechanisms for effects are thermal and non-thermal. These two mechanisms are indicated on the screen of ultrasound devices by two indices: The thermal index (TI) and the mechanical index (MI). These are the purposes of this thesis: • evaluate end-users’ knowledge regarding the safety of ultrasound; • evaluate and make a comparison between acoustic output indices (AOI) in B-mode (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound – those measured by thermal (TI) and mechanical (MI) indices; • assess the acoustic output indices (AOI) to benchmark current practice with a survey conducted by the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS); and • review how to design 2D and 3D arrays for medical ultrasound imagingen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/en
dc.subjectDiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectImaging systems in medicineen_US
dc.subjectBiomedical engineeringen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic imagingen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonics in medicineen_US
dc.title2D & 3D ultrasound systems in development of medical imaging technologyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering - Master's Degree
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
213308770_Eljaaidi_AA_MTech_Elec_Eng_2016.pdfThesis3.73 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,605
Last Week
1,169
Last month
1,169
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

683
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons