Testing middle ground: facilitating community transition to sustainable land governance

Abstract

This study investigates the transition from traditional to modern land governance systems within communal settlements, with a specific emphasis on psychological, sociological, and philosophical influences. It addresses a critical gap in the literature by examining the complexities inherent in this transition process and its implications for community development and governance effectiveness. Drawing upon a qualitative case study methodology, this research explores the dynamics of land tenure reform in a mission village in the Western Cape. Through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, the study analyses power dynamics, dominance, ideology, and causal structures to illuminate the social, economic, and political dimensions of land governance. The chosen theoretical framework encompasses planned behaviour, institutional capacity, and critical theory, providing a comprehensive lens through which to interpret factors influencing community readiness for alternative governance. Key findings reveal significant insights into the correlation between belief and behaviour regarding land rights arrangements, the necessity for institutional development during the transition, and the underlying philosophical structural mechanisms driving community actions. These findings offer valuable implications for policymakers and stakeholders, emphasising the importance of fostering community participation, adapting to new governance arrangements, and integrating established institutions with modernisation efforts. Furthermore, this research contributes to broader discussions on communal land governance by providing localised insights applicable to other communal settlements or regions. The study's methodological advancements include a framework for assessing community readiness and facilitating transitions, which practitioners and policymakers are encouraged to utilise for informed decision-making and effective governance strategies. Despite its contributions, this study acknowledges limitations such as sample size and contextual specificity, underscoring the need for further research in diverse settings. Overall, this thesis enriches the understanding of hybrid land governance and its real-world applicability, offering practical implications for sustainable development and improved governance outcomes in communal settlement projects.