Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/1972
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorJoubert, Jurieen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaroo, David Josephen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-27T08:15:20Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-26T06:31:15Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-27T08:15:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-26T06:31:15Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/1972-
dc.descriptionThesis (DTech (Education))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2009en_US
dc.description.abstractThe phenomena of multi - grade schools has been absent both in educational policy making, educator training and only represented in a few local educational curriculum research projects. However, the practice of multi-grade is common in South Africa and especially in rural and farming South Africa. Our National Curriculum Statements implies that all schools are the same. This study addresses this anomaly. Farm schools, which started as a political means of cheap labour (Act 47 of 1953) presented a further complication to the ministry: public schools on private property govern by section 14 contract failed farm education (Forgotten Schools, 2004; Ministerial report on rural education, 2005; Commission on Human Rights, 2006). The political and ideological shift from People's Education, which, at first envision human rights in line with international treaties such Education For All, Convention on the right of the child, Africa Charter on the Rights of the Child to Human Capital Development has marginalize the farm and rural learner. Curriculum changes since Curriculum 2005 accepted the same political and economic vision. The first world technical National Curriculum Statements mismatch farm education as systemic results since 2004 has shown. The government’s deficit view and national curriculum influence farm and rural teaching and learning negatively. This study focuses on curriculum delivery (intended I implemented) planning. How the educator adapted the curriculum to suit the needs of third world farm learner, its multi-grade context and the ideology of the hegemony. The qualitative paradigm will be that of the critical theory and grounded theory methodology with the goal of uncovering the educators' views and practice. This has been done by holding interviews with various foundation phase educators and looking at the seating arrangements and planning. The sample was from the Breede River District. A focus group of nineteen ACE students with 312 collective years experience has been involved in the coding and analysing. Current practice and planning have been juxtaposed with international multi-grade practice. The research questions were aimed at uncovering how rural and farm educators plan for their multi-grade classes when faces with a national mono-grade curriculum. Various research methodologies were used.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectLooping (Education) -- South Africaen_US
dc.subjectCombination of grades -- Breede Riveren_US
dc.subjectMultigrade educationen_US
dc.titleCurriculum delivery in multi-grade rural schools in the Breede River / Overberg EMDCen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Education - Doctoral Degrees
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
faroo_dj_dtech_edu_2009_pdf19.48 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,952
Last Week
1,459
Last month
1,459
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

199
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons