Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/2864
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMcAuliffe, Sharon, Dr-
dc.contributor.authorAfonso, Dominique Gabriala-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-24T05:45:35Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-24T05:45:35Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2864-
dc.descriptionThesis (MEd)--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2019.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe mathematics results in South Africa are alarmingly low, with a number of high school learners unable to compute basic operations. International test results show South Africa consistently ranks low in comparison to other countries whilst Singapore continues to perform well. Some schools in South Africa have decided to adopt the Singaporean method of teaching mathematics, known as Singapore Maths, in the hope of improving learner results. This study seeks to understand how two different curricula, South African and Singapore, provide opportunity for the development of algebraic thinking in the Foundation Phase. There is ongoing research which suggests a link between algebraic thinking (Early Algebra) and a deeper conceptual understanding of mathematics (Blanton & Kaput, 2003). This study comprises a qualitative case study of two schools using different curricula and textbooks to teach algebraic thinking with a special focus on patterns and functional thinking. Data were gathered using document analysis of curriculum and textbooks; learner tests; semi structured interviews with class teachers and focus group interviews with Grade 3 learners from each curriculum group. The analysis process involved pattern matching and building explanations related to each data collection instrument using Blanton, Brizuela, Gardiner, Sawrey and Newman-Owen’s (2015) levels of sophistication in learner’s thinking about functional relationships. The results of the study suggest that although South African learners have the potential to think algebraically, they are not, however, always offered the opportunities to do so. The importance of suitable mathematical activities and scaffolding is highlighted and the critical need for professional development for teachers in which the importance of Early Algebra is defined and explained. It is imperative that the curriculum and textbooks activities are relooked at to address the development of algebraic thinking in the early grades and shift the focus from an emphasis on arithmetic relationships to thinking in generalised ways about functional relationships.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.1-
dc.subjectAlgebra -- Study and teaching (Elementary)en_US
dc.subjectMathematics -- Study and teaching (Elementary)en_US
dc.subjectMathematics -- Curriculaen_US
dc.subjectCritical thinkingen_US
dc.titleThe development of algebraic thinking in the foundation phase: a comparative study of two different curriculaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Education - Masters Degrees
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DG_ Afonso.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,917
Last Week
2,916
Last month
2,916
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Download(s)

3,554
checked on Feb 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons